Your Fear About Extradiction Has No Basis, Govt Security Agencies Tell Kashamu

The three agency therefore urged the court to dismiss the suit with punitive and substantial cost against Kashamu.

Kashamu, a senator representing Ogun East Senatorial district at the National Assembly and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the Saturday’s gubernatorial election in Ogun State, has sued the three agencies alongside Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and Nigeria Police Force (NPF), in a fundamental right enforcement suit.

Kashamu in the suit marked  FHC/L/CS/930/2018, filed by his lawyer, Ifeoma Esom, is asking the court for an order restraining all the respondents from arresting or detaining him in any matter whatsoever interfering with his personal liberty and freedom of movement on the basis of his lawyer letter dated May 23, 2018, wherein he protested  NDLEA’s invitation to US government  to send a fresh  request for his extradition.

He also asked the court for a declaration that the instructions given by the AGF to other respondents on May 25, 2018, in reaction to his letter dated May 23, 2018, wherein he protested the NDLEA’s invitation to the US government to send a request for his extradition to US, and the attempt and any further attempts by the first to fourth respondents to arrest him on the basis of the AGF’s said instructions are breach of his fundamental rights to personal liberty and freedom as  guaranteed by Section 35 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended and Article 14 of the African Charter on Human and People Rights.

At the resumed hearing of the matter Friday, the three agencies who were represented by counsel, in their respective preliminary objections and counter affidavits, urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s suit for being Speculative and abuse of court process.

In urging the court to dismiss the suit against DSS, its counsel, Mr. M. O. Bajela, told the court that the applicant filed the suit on speculation which contradicted section 115 (3)(4) of the Evidence Act, 2011, as amended.

Bajela therefore urged the court to dismiss the suit as the law does not operate on speculation.

In his own words, Mr. J. N. Sunday, who led Ichakpa Oigoga  for NDLEA, while urging the court to dismiss  Buruji’s suit against his agency with substantive cost, he also told the court that the suit is based on speculation.

He informed the court that the same ploy was used by the applicant in 2014 and 2015, which he said his agency have got judgement in two appeal filed against the applicant.

He said: “the whole substance of this suit is based on speculation. This is what gave birth to the suits in 2014 and 2015, the whole process is aimed at stoping the extradition process.

“It has been in the character of the plaintiff in several applications both at the Federal High Court, Abuja, and Court of Appeal, based on speculation and fear of being extradited. He also said the purpose of the preliminary objection is that the applicant’s suit is forum shopping as the suits are identical, the substance of the reliefs sought are the same.

“Based on the supporting affidavit of the applicant’s motion, the applicant admitted that there is an indictment of an Illinois Court, USA”.

In urging the court to dismiss the suit for being abuse of court process, Mr. Sunday, who is Head of NDLEA Legal Department, further told the court that the applicant’s suit as presently constituted is haven the same parties and subjects matter, which is basically extradition.

He therefore urged the court to dismiss the suit with substantive cost.

Also, Mr. Tolulope Mukolu, counsel to AGF, while aligning himself with the submissions of the DSS and NDLEA, told the court that the applicant failed to exhibits any letter written by AGF requesting  the America government to commence extradition process against the applicant.

Mukolu also told the court the Buruji’s suit is speculative, apprehensive and abuse of court process. He also urge the court to dismiss it and award a punitive cost against the applicant.

Responding to the agencies’ counter-affidavits, Kashamu’s counsel, Mrs. Ijeoma Esom, urged the court to hold that her client’s suit is not an abuse of court Process as claimed by the respondents.

Esom told the court that respondents fails to show that parties and the subject matter are the same.

Kashamu’s lawyer, also informed the court that in 2015, NDLEA with other security agencies, invaded the home of the applicant with 50 armed men, while they were all in court, saying that, that was what led to 2015’s suit.

Esom said the lawlessness of the NDLEA and AGF is what brought about the present suit against the respondents.

She said: “we are here because the fifth respondent (AGF) wrote to USA authority inviting US government to bring request for the extradition of the applicant. The applicant then saw it as illegal for AGF to invite America government for his extradition.

“That is why we are here. I urged the court to hold that the suit is not abuse of court process and dismiss the objection of the respondents”.

After listened to the submissions of all parties, Justice Chukwejekwu Aneke, adjourned the matter till April 29, for judgement.